
In a significant shift in U.S. foreign aid policy, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that approximately 82% of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)’s programs have been officially terminated, following a six-week government-ordered review.
Rubio posted on social platform X, stating the terminated initiatives "spent tens of billions in ways that did not serve... and often harmed... U.S. interests." The remaining 18% of programs will now be directly managed under the U.S. State Department.
This decision comes under the broader foreign assistance restructuring directive launched by President Donald Trump upon his return to the White House in January 2025, as part of his administration’s "America First" strategy.
Foreign Aid Freeze and Administrative Overhaul
On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order freezing foreign assistance funding and ordering a comprehensive audit of USAID programs. The review was led by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), overseen by Elon Musk, who was appointed to spearhead structural reforms.
As part of this review process:
- Thousands of USAID employees were placed on administrative leave.
- Overseas personnel were recalled to Washington.
- Roughly 5,200 out of 6,200 development programs were discontinued.
- Thousands of contracts were canceled, and large-scale employee terminations followed.
Rubio credited the overhaul as a "historic reform," thanking Doge and State Department staff for their "long hours" and "efficiency."
Humanitarian Concerns and Legal Pushback
The decision has sparked intense backlash from human rights organizations, international aid agencies, and Democratic lawmakers, who argue that the shutdown undermines congressionally authorized funding and violates federal appropriations laws. Several lawsuits are reportedly underway to challenge the legality of the move.
Organizations warn the cuts could have severe humanitarian consequences, particularly in crisis-affected regions. Examples include:
-
Sudan: Over 1,100 emergency kitchens serving displaced populations have been forced to close following the suspension of aid. Nearly two million people have been impacted amid the ongoing civil conflict.
-
Oman: Dozens of Afghan women scholars, who had fled the Taliban regime, now face deportation after their USAID-funded higher education scholarships were abruptly revoked.
-
India: The country’s first USAID-supported medical clinics for transgender individuals have ceased operations in three major cities due to halted funding.
USAID programs have traditionally addressed a range of global development goals, including:
- Famine monitoring and response
- Vaccination campaigns (e.g., polio eradication)
- Disaster relief
- Educational access and gender equity programs
- Health infrastructure and HIV/AIDS prevention
Remaining Programs Shift to State Department Control
According to Secretary Rubio, the remaining 18% of USAID programs.... deemed “strategically vital”.... will continue under State Department administration, albeit with "revised efficiency standards" imposed by Doge.
Rubio said, “In consultation with Congress, we intend for the remaining programs to be administered more effectively under the State Department, with stronger performance metrics and tighter financial oversight.”
However, critics argue that consolidating USAID operations into the State Department could further politicize humanitarian aid and diminish independent development expertise that USAID has historically provided.
Global Reaction and Diplomatic Repercussions
International governments and partner agencies have expressed alarm over the aid withdrawal. Humanitarian leaders have warned the abrupt funding cuts could weaken U.S. influence in global development partnerships and open space for geopolitical competitors, such as China and Russia, to fill the void.
European Union officials reportedly plan to convene emergency meetings to coordinate alternative funding streams to compensate for discontinued U.S. aid in affected regions.
Meanwhile, United Nations agencies have voiced concerns that global food insecurity and displacement crises could escalate without continued U.S. support.
Conclusion: A Profound Shift in U.S. Global Aid Strategy
The widespread termination of USAID programs marks one of the most significant restructurings of U.S. foreign aid in recent history. While the Trump administration maintains that the overhaul aligns aid with national interests and fiscal responsibility, humanitarian stakeholders warn of widespread disruption, reduced health and education access, and long-term development setbacks.
As legal battles unfold and international fallout continues, the future of U.S. foreign assistance remains uncertain.... potentially reshaping America's global engagement footprint for years to come.
Keywords: USAID project termination, USAID global aid cuts, foreign aid reduction, USAID funding news, USAID budget cuts, international aid news, US foreign aid updates, global development aid, USAID project shutdown, aid project cancellation